Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Yi-34B

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.3

Rank #31 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 59.5 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 91.7% for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 14.7% for Yi-34B.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Pro and Yi-34B specifications
DeepSeek V4 ProYi-34B
ProviderDeepSeek01.AI
Noometry Index54.327.8
Released2026-04-242023-11-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.66—
Output $ / M tokens$1.98—
Results tracked4823

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProYi-34B
LMArena Coding14701112
SWE-bench Verified77.6%—
FrontierCode28.6%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode51%—
WeirdML66.2%—
ALE-Bench1,403—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProYi-34B
APEX-Agents47.3%—
Vending-Bench 23,285—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14611104
Epoch Capabilities Index155.31117.39
ARC-AGI-261.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)91.3%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles47%—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench93.9%—
LMCA45.5%—
Surface Evolver Bench40%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
ForecastBench56.1—

Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProYi-34B
LMArena Math14551114
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)64.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.6%—
ProofBench50%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProYi-34B
GPQA Diamond91.7%14.7%
LMArena Expert14641061
SimpleQA Verified52.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.6%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProYi-34B
LMArena Non-English14391079
LMArena Chinese14861176
LMArena French14721081
LMArena German14581042
LMArena Japanese1445993
LMArena Korean1447959
LMArena Russian14531050
LMArena Spanish14581070

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14481091

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14581094
CL-bench Life13.5%—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Pro leads

DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 ProYi-34B
LMArena Text14511129
LMArena Creative Writing14461108
LMArena Multi-Turn14671113
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1553—
EQ-Bench 41166—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Yi-34B?

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Yi-34B better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Yi-34B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper