Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 60.7 to 14.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Gemini 3.5 Flash and 4.4% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 54.2 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2026-05-19 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $9 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1235 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1220 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.46 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 4.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1504 | 1242 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | 46.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1495 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1310 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1476 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1526 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | — |
| LMArena German | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1233 |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1470 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.