Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Wizardlm 70b

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #29 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

32.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.7 to 19.8.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index54.132.4
Released2026-05-19—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$9—
Results tracked5412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14921081
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14881079
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.55—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math15021116
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)62.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench31%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond92.8%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—
LMArena Expert1493—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1311—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14751078
LMArena Chinese15251052
LMArena German15001083
LMArena Russian14911155
LMArena French1490—
LMArena Japanese1481—
LMArena Korean1453—
LMArena Spanish1478—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14661093

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14811097

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14811120
LMArena Creative Writing14671149
LMArena Multi-Turn14821108
EQ-Bench 41087—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Wizardlm 70b?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.1 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper