Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.8 to 26.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 54.2 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2026-05-19 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $9 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.4 (#49), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1492 | 1319 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 79.3% | — |
| DeepSWE | 37.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1499 | — |
| SciCode | 53.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 62.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 911.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.7 (#114), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 27.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 6.7% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,396 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.8 (#18), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1308 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 72.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 92.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 92.5% | — |
| CritPt | 13.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 50% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 25.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 4.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 47.1% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 58.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.46 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.7 (#36), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1504 | 1273 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 62.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#11), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1495 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#15), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1310 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 33.6% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1463 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.0 (#13), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1476 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1526 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1493 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1490 | — |
| LMArena German | 1492 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1451 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.0 (#30), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1467 | 1278 |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.4 (#38), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#47), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1482 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1470 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1303 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1087 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.2 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.4 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.