Model comparison
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Pro leads 56.5 to 26.1.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 54.3 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 393K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.66 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.98 | — |
| Results tracked | 48 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1470 | 1319 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 28.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | — |
| SciCode | 51% | — |
| WeirdML | 66.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,403 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 47.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,285 | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1461 | 1308 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 61.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 91.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 43% | — |
| DTBench | 93.9% | — |
| LMCA | 45.5% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 40% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.31 | — |
| ForecastBench | 56.1 | — |
Math DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1273 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 76.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 50% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 52.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1464 | — |
Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1486 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1453 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | — |
| LMArena German | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | — |
Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1448 | 1278 |
Long Context DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1458 | 1309 |
| CL-bench Life | 13.5% | — |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Pro leads
DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1451 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1446 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1467 | 1303 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1553 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1166 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.3 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.4 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.