Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs QwQ-32B
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and QwQ-32B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.2 to 50.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 83.3% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 65.3% for QwQ-32B.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 39 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), QwQ-32B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1325 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 137.6 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math QwQ-32B leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 59.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1359 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1324 |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), QwQ-32B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1354 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1288 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than QwQ-32B?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or QwQ-32B better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and QwQ-32B share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.