Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen-14B

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.8

Rank #113 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #273 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.4 to 27.8.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.830.8
Released2026-07-212023-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked3818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96), Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Coding14551072
LMArena WebDev1440—
SciCode41.3%—
WeirdML39%—
ALE-Bench765.27—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
GDP.pdf10%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95), Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14411027
Epoch Capabilities Index145.12112.8
ARC-AGI-210.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)60.4%—
ARC-AGI-153.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles22%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench83.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
LAMBADA—71.1%
PIQA—79.9%

Math Qwen-14B leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245), Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Math14311068
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench13%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
GPQA Diamond83.3%—
LMArena Expert1430—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%
MMLU—66.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38), Qwen-14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1266—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59), Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English14281042
LMArena Chinese14671077
LMArena French1452—
LMArena German1454—
LMArena Japanese1428—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Russian1443—
LMArena Spanish1440—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77), Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following14201031

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query14351029

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55), Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteQwen-14B
LMArena Text14361051
LMArena Creative Writing14191028
LMArena Multi-Turn14451022
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Qwen-14B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper