Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Palm 2

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.5

Rank #133 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Palm 2 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.2 to 25.6.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Palm 2 specifications
Gemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index41.530.0
Released2026-07-21—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked3910

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Coding1453994
LMArena WebDev1440—
SciCode41.3%—
WeirdML39%—
ALE-Bench765.27—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
APEX-Agents29.3%—
GDP.pdf10%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14411005
ARC-AGI-210.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)60.4%—
ARC-AGI-153.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles22%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench83.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.13—

Math Palm 2 leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Math14331049
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench13%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
GPQA Diamond83.3%—
LMArena Expert1435—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Vision1268—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Non-English1427916
LMArena Chinese1469887
LMArena French1451—
LMArena German1454—
LMArena Japanese1427—
LMArena Korean1407—
LMArena Russian1443—
LMArena Spanish1442—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14201010

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Longer Query14351010

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Text14351027
LMArena Creative Writing1420991
LMArena Multi-Turn1445994
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Palm 2?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Palm 2 better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper