Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.5

Rank #133 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 25.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 41.3% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash specifications
Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index41.541.3
Released2026-07-212025-12-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output66K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$0.28
Results tracked3921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena WebDev14401330
SciCode41.3%25.9%
LMArena Coding14531443
ALE-Bench765.27737.95
WeirdML39%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
APEX-Agents29.3%—
GDP.pdf10%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
CritPt0%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14411420
ARC-AGI-210.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)60.4%—
ARC-AGI-153.5%—
Chess Puzzles22%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench83.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.13—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math14331396
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench13%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert14351425
GPQA Diamond83.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Vision1268—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English14271392
LMArena Chinese14691462
LMArena French14511429
LMArena German14541395
LMArena Japanese14271325
LMArena Korean14071358
LMArena Russian14431387
LMArena Spanish14421420

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14201392

Long Context Too close to call

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14351409

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text14351411
LMArena Creative Writing14201375
LMArena Multi-Turn14451404
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 41.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper