Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 13% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 63% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 48.5 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1637 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 51.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1504 |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1482 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 13% | 63% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1468 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1501 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | 1259 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1463 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1451 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.