Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 36.8 to 25.9.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 43.4 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1438 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | 43.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 513.95 |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), MiMo-V2.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1450 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 13% | 16% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1436 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1460 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | 1247 |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1468 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1416 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1434 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1445 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and MiMo-V2.5 share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.