Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.5

Rank #133 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.2 to 50.2.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index41.539.6
Released2026-07-21—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked3911

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding14531319
LMArena WebDev1440—
SciCode41.3%—
WeirdML39%—
ALE-Bench765.27—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
APEX-Agents29.3%—
GDP.pdf10%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts14411308
ARC-AGI-210.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)60.4%—
ARC-AGI-153.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles22%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench83.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.13—

Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math14331273
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench13%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
GPQA Diamond83.3%—
LMArena Expert1435—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Vision1268—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English14271285
LMArena Chinese14691358
LMArena Russian14431305
LMArena French1451—
LMArena German1454—
LMArena Japanese1427—
LMArena Korean1407—
LMArena Spanish1442—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following14201278

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query14351309

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text14351311
LMArena Creative Writing14201269
LMArena Multi-Turn14451303
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper