Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 1 category and Muse Glimmer in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 50.2.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1417 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1390 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Muse Glimmer share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.