Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-6 Sol
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 4 categories and GPT-6 Sol in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 49.3 to 27.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 60.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 90.1% for GPT-6 Sol.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6 Sol.
- GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.05M.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 49.2 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $10 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96), GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1692 |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1453 |
| DeepSWE | — | 68.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 49.3% |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82), GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 10% | 28% |
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95), GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 90.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1420 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 53.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.12 | — |
Math GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245), GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1404 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66), GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1430 | 1449 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.5% |
Multimodal GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38), GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 58.3% |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59), GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1428 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1407 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | 1377 |
| LMArena French | 1452 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77), GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1406 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80), GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55), GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1396 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1392 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 2125 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1405 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GPT-6 Sol?
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-6 Sol?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol lists at $2 and $10.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-6 Sol better for coding?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-6 Sol share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 22.