Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GPT-3.5-turbo
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and GPT-3.5-turbo in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.1 to 10.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 71.1% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 2.2% for GPT-3.5-turbo.
- GPT-3.5-turbo is cheaper at $0.50 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 16K.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 23.2 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2023-03-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 16K |
| Max output | 66K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 44 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), GPT-3.5-turbo: 23.9 (#331)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 39% | 3.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1136 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 39.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.6% |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 70.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), GPT-3.5-turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 21.5% |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), GPT-3.5-turbo: 13.8 (#332)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1108 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | 3% |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 48.5% |
| LMCA | 37.6% | 9.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 118.55 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 61.6% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 57% |
| ForecastBench | — | 50.4 |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.6% |
Math Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), GPT-3.5-turbo: 6.3 (#327)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 2.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1142 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 15.9% |
| GSM8K | — | 57.8% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), GPT-3.5-turbo: 10.0 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 28% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1070 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 87.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 87% |
| MMLU | — | 71.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 86% |
| TriviaQA | — | 85.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), GPT-3.5-turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), GPT-3.5-turbo: 31.5 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1108 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1075 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1118 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1090 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1043 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1123 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1121 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), GPT-3.5-turbo: 57.9 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1119 |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), GPT-3.5-turbo: 34.0 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1121 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), GPT-3.5-turbo: 25.3 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GPT-3.5-turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1125 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1092 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 451 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1117 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GPT-3.5-turbo?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-3.5-turbo?
GPT-3.5-turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GPT-3.5-turbo better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 23.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 16K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GPT-3.5-turbo share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and GPT-3.5-turbo has 44.