Model comparison

GPT-3.5-turbo vs Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-3.5-turbo OpenAI

23.2

Rank #350 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-3.5-turbo scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 6.3.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-3.5-turbo and Muse Glimmer specifications
GPT-3.5-turboMuse Glimmer
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index23.241.7
Released2023-03-012026-08-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window16K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked4415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 23.9 (#331), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboMuse Glimmer
LMArena Coding11361416
LMArena WebDev—1355
SciCode—44.9%
WeirdML3.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct39.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.6%—
HumanEval+70.7%—
MBPP+69.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-3.5-turbo: —, Muse Glimmer: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboMuse Glimmer
METR Time Horizons21.5%—

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 13.8 (#332), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboMuse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts11081396
CritPt—2.6%
Chess Puzzles0%—
Mystery Game Puzzles3%—
DTBench48.5%—
LMCA9.7%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard61.6%—
CommonsenseQA 2.057%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.55—
ForecastBench50.4—
WinoGrande81.6%—

Math Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 6.3 (#327), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math11421417
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.2%—
MATH Level 515.9%—
GSM8K57.8%—

Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 10.0 (#303), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert10701386
GPQA Diamond28%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.4%—
BoolQ87%—
MMLU71.4%—
OpenBookQA86%—
TriviaQA85.8%—

Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 31.5 (#258), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English11081384
LMArena Chinese10751412
LMArena Russian11231390
LMArena French1118—
LMArena German1090—
LMArena Japanese1043—
LMArena Korean1019—
LMArena Spanish1121—

Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 57.9 (#262), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following11191375

Long Context Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 34.0 (#254), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query11211382

Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads

GPT-3.5-turbo: 25.3 (#305), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-3.5-turboMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text11251389
LMArena Creative Writing10921339
LMArena Multi-Turn11171399
EQ-Bench Creative Writing451—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-3.5-turbo better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-3.5-turbo or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 23.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-3.5-turbo and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-3.5-turbo has 44 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper