Model comparison
GPT-3.5-turbo vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-3.5-turbo scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 6.3.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-3.5-turbo | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 23.2 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2023-03-01 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 16K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 44 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
GPT-3.5-turbo: 23.9 (#331), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | GPT-3.5-turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1136 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| WeirdML | 3.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 39.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 50.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 69.7% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-3.5-turbo: —, Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | GPT-3.5-turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 21.5% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
GPT-3.5-turbo: 13.8 (#332), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | GPT-3.5-turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1108 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 3% | — |
| DTBench | 48.5% | — |
| LMCA | 9.7% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 61.6% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 57% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.55 | — |
| ForecastBench | 50.4 | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
GPT-3.5-turbo: 6.3 (#327), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | GPT-3.5-turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1142 | 1417 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 15.9% | — |
| GSM8K | 57.8% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
GPT-3.5-turbo: 10.0 (#303), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | GPT-3.5-turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1070 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 28% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 87.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 87% | — |
| MMLU | 71.4% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 86% | — |
| TriviaQA | 85.8% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
GPT-3.5-turbo: 31.5 (#258), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | GPT-3.5-turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1108 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1075 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1123 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1118 | — |
| LMArena German | 1090 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1043 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1121 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
GPT-3.5-turbo: 57.9 (#262), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | GPT-3.5-turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1119 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
GPT-3.5-turbo: 34.0 (#254), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-3.5-turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1121 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
GPT-3.5-turbo: 25.3 (#305), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | GPT-3.5-turbo | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1125 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1092 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1117 | 1399 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 451 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-3.5-turbo better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 23.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-3.5-turbo or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 23.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-3.5-turbo and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-3.5-turbo has 44 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.