Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.7

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.5

Rank #133 Confirmed

GLM-4.7 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #124 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and GLM-4.7 in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.7 leads 38.6 to 25.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 22% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 6% for GLM-4.7.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.20 for GLM-4.7.
  • Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
  • GLM-4.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index41.542.0
Released2026-07-212025-12-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M205K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.60
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$2.20
Results tracked3936

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.7 leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), GLM-4.7: 44.0 (#79)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena WebDev14401435
SciCode41.3%45.1%
LMArena Coding14531454
ALE-Bench765.27399.48
WeirdML39%—

Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), GLM-4.7: 26.5 (#103)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
Terminal-Bench—33.4%
APEX-Agents29.3%—
GDP.pdf10%—
Vending-Bench 2—2,377

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), GLM-4.7: 24.3 (#164)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
CritPt0%1.7%
Chess Puzzles22%6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14411443
Epoch Capabilities Index145.13143.51
ARC-AGI-210.3%—
SimpleBench—47.7%
NYT Connections (extended)60.4%—
ARC-AGI-153.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench83.5%—
LMCA37.6%—

Math GLM-4.7 leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), GLM-4.7: 38.6 (#135)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%83.3%
ProofBench13%6%
LMArena Math14331423
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—2.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), GLM-4.7: 47.0 (#80)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
GPQA Diamond83.3%83.3%
LMArena Expert14351424
SimpleQA Verified—32.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), GLM-4.7: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Vision1268—

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), GLM-4.7: 52.8 (#79)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Non-English14271417
LMArena Chinese14691495
LMArena French14511432
LMArena German14541424
LMArena Japanese14271439
LMArena Korean14071399
LMArena Russian14431423
LMArena Spanish14421434

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), GLM-4.7: 74.4 (#95)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Instruction Following14201411

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), GLM-4.7: 42.8 (#116)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Longer Query14351432
CL-bench—15.9%
CL-bench Life—10.9%

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), GLM-4.7: 60.9 (#93)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGLM-4.7
LMArena Text14351435
LMArena Creative Writing14201401
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15591413
LMArena Multi-Turn14451446

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.7?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.7?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; GLM-4.7 lists at $0.60 and $2.20.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.7 better for coding?

GLM-4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.7 share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper