Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3 14B

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 7.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google

56.7

Rank #23 Confirmed

Qwen3 14B Alibaba (Qwen)

35.5

Rank #225 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3 14B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 18.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 55% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 4% for Qwen3 14B.
  • Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index56.735.5
Released2026-02-192025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output66K8K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.35
Output $ / M tokens$12$1.40
Results tracked7112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
SciCode58.9%31.6%
SWE-bench Verified75.6%—
DeepSWE11.7%—
LMArena WebDev1447—
GSO22.6%—
WeirdML72.1%—
LMArena Coding1484—
MirrorCode8.9%—
ALE-Bench1,161—
AlgoTune2.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34), Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents35.3%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41%
τ²-bench Banking26%—
DeepResearch Bench47.8%—
PostTrainBench22%—
BALROG57%—
ExploitBench26.1%—
GBAEval0.8%—
GDP.pdf17%—
LMArena Search1211—
METR Time Horizons77%—
Vending-Bench 23,774—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
CritPt17.7%0%
Chess Puzzles55%4%
DTBench97.1%64%
LMCA53.8%18.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.77138.23
ARC-AGI-277.1%—
SimpleBench79.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.1%
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
ARC-AGI-198%—
EnigmaEval36.8%—
Thematic Generalization79.4%—
EBR-Bench14.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1485—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%66.4%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)59.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions86.5%—
ProofBench26%—
LMArena Math1485—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)36.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)16.7%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond94.4%63.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.4%5.4%
Humanity's Last Exam46.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.5%—
LMArena Expert1485—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
LMArena Vision1296—
Blueprint-Bench 226.5%—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
LMArena Non-English1477—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1487—
LMArena German1491—
LMArena Japanese1493—
LMArena Korean1455—
LMArena Russian1498—
LMArena Spanish1479—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1466—

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.5%
CL-bench20.8%—
CL-bench Life16.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1483—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37), Qwen3 14B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3 14B
LMArena Text1481—
LMArena Creative Writing1482—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—
EQ-Bench 41142—
LMArena Multi-Turn1488—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Qwen3 14B?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 7.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview lists at $2 and $12.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Qwen3 14B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper