Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Google

56.7

Rank #23 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 23.4.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderGoogleNVIDIA
Noometry Index56.735.9
Released2026-02-192024-06-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$12—
Results tracked7117

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.5 (#99), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding14841209
SWE-bench Verified75.6%—
DeepSWE11.7%—
LMArena WebDev1447—
SciCode58.9%—
GSO22.6%—
WeirdML72.1%—
MirrorCode8.9%—
ALE-Bench1,161—
AlgoTune2.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#34), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents35.3%—
τ²-bench Banking26%—
DeepResearch Bench47.8%—
PostTrainBench22%—
BALROG57%—
ExploitBench26.1%—
GBAEval0.8%—
GDP.pdf17%—
LMArena Search1211—
METR Time Horizons77%—
Vending-Bench 23,774—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#12), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14851202
ARC-AGI-277.1%—
SimpleBench79.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)97.4%—
ARC-AGI-198%—
CritPt17.7%—
Chess Puzzles55%—
EnigmaEval36.8%—
Thematic Generalization79.4%—
EBR-Bench14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.1%—
LMCA53.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.77—
ForecastBench59—

Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 62.1 (#34), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math14851216
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)59.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions86.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench26%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)36.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)16.7%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert14851171
GPQA Diamond94.4%—
Humanity's Last Exam46.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.9 (#69), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Vision1296—
Blueprint-Bench 226.5%—
Furniture Assembly26.7%—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.0 (#12), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14771206
LMArena Chinese15291214
LMArena French14871197
LMArena German14911192
LMArena Japanese14931128
LMArena Korean14551148
LMArena Russian14981219
LMArena Spanish14791195

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.0 (#32), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14661203

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.4 (#18), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14831225
CL-bench20.8%—
CL-bench Life16.9%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.1 (#37), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text14811225
LMArena Creative Writing14821203
LMArena Multi-Turn14881214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—
EQ-Bench 41142—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper