Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Step 3.5 Flash
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 42.4 to 37.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 8.2% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 28.4% for Step 3.5 Flash.
- Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 42.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2026-01-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 256K |
| Max output | 66K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1436 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | 28.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1411 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |
Math Step 3.5 Flash leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1408 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1421 |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1447 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1354 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1352 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1419 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1385 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1402 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1405 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Step 3.5 Flash share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.