Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Phi-4 Mini
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 3 categories and Phi-4 Mini in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 41.9 to 25.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 41.9% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Max output | 66K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.9% | 10.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1428 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | 23.5% |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena French | 1424 | — |
| LMArena German | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Phi-4 Mini?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Phi-4 Mini?
Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Phi-4 Mini share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.