Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 43.9.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 300K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2026-03-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 10K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1400 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1256 |
| SciCode | — | 41.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 797.73 |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 37.3% |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1407 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 144.47 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8.2% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 25% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 63.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 76.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 35% |
| ForecastBench | — | 54.4 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1428 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 27.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 80% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | 8.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | 8.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1398 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1240 |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1411 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1461 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1424 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1392 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1420 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1421 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1377 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1394 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1416 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1417 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38.