Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Llama 3.1-70B
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 9 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 40.7 to 13.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 80% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 3.6% for Llama 3.1-70B.
- Llama 3.1-70B is cheaper at $0.40 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.50 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Llama 3.1-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 29.6 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2024-07-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Max output | 66K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 52.2% | 9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1260 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | — |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.8% |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 6.9% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
| BALROG | — | 27.9% |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1241 |
| DTBench | 76.8% | 60% |
| LMCA | 35% | 14.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | 125.92 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | 3.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1252 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 21% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 36.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | 44.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1209 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 65.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| MMLU | — | 80.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Llama 3.1-70B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1219 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1215 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | 1261 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1132 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1140 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1253 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1231 |
| IFEval | — | 82.1% |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1241 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | Llama 3.1-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1261 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1232 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1256 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 784 |
| WildBench | — | 75.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Llama 3.1-70B?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Llama 3.1-70B?
Llama 3.1-70B is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite lists at $0.25 and $1.50.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Llama 3.1-70B share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.