Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Llama 2-13B

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.4

Rank #141 Confirmed

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.1

Rank #304 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 61.0 to 30.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 76.8% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and 42.2% for Llama 2-13B.
  • Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Llama 2-13B specifications
Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index40.429.1
Released2026-03-032023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked3832

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.5 (#179), Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
LMArena Coding14001062
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
ALE-Bench797.73—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 29.9 (#72), Llama 2-13B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.3 (#181), Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
Chess Puzzles25%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14071051
DTBench76.8%42.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index144.45105.8
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
LMCA35%—
BIG-Bench Hard—58.2%
ForecastBench54.4—
HellaSwag—80.7%
LAMBADA—76.5%
PIQA—80.8%
WinoGrande—72.8%

Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.5 (#82), Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
LMArena Math14271065
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
GSM8K—36.9%

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.7 (#95), Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
LMArena Expert13971030
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.3%
BoolQ—82.4%
MMLU—55.6%
OpenBookQA—57%
TriviaQA—79.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 38.7 (#57), Llama 2-13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
LMArena Vision1240—
ScienceQA—55.8%

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.5 (#82), Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
LMArena Non-English14101024
LMArena Chinese14611001
LMArena French14231043
LMArena German14291009
LMArena Japanese1411894
LMArena Korean1393953
LMArena Russian14201055
LMArena Spanish14201086

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.9 (#126), Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
LMArena Instruction Following13761046

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#117), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
LMArena Longer Query13941064

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 61.0 (#90), Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteLlama 2-13B
LMArena Text14161085
LMArena Creative Writing14011047
LMArena Multi-Turn14171050

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Llama 2-13B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper