Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GLM-5V-Turbo
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 2 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 29.7 to 22.9.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.25 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-03 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $4 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1256 | 1401 |
| LMArena Coding | 1400 | 1466 |
| SciCode | 41.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 797.73 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), GLM-5V-Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| DeepResearch Bench | 37.3% | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1407 | 1443 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 8.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 25% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 76.8% | — |
| LMCA | 35% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.47 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.4 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1428 | 1441 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 27.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 80% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1452 |
| GPQA Diamond | 81.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 8.2% | — |
Multimodal GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1240 | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1411 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1488 |
| LMArena French | 1424 | 1444 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1423 |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1420 | 1431 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1450 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1377 | 1423 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1394 | 1438 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1416 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1417 | 1432 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs 3.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-5V-Turbo?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.