Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 30.4.
  • Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index40.831.3
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked3819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Coding14001084
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
ALE-Bench797.73—
HumanEval+—35.4%
MBPP+—45%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts14071071
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.47—
ForecastBench54.4—

Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Math14281107
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Expert13981039
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Vision1240—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Non-English14111052
LMArena Chinese14611061
LMArena French14241065
LMArena German14291054
LMArena Japanese1413971
LMArena Korean1392988
LMArena Russian14201046
LMArena Spanish14211049

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Instruction Following13771057

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Longer Query13941056

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemma 1.1 7b IT
LMArena Text14161094
LMArena Creative Writing14011060
LMArena Multi-Turn14171040

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper