Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.5 Flash leads 36.4 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 63.9% for Gemini 2.5 Flash and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-04-17 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.03 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | 15.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1415 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | 31.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | — |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89.8% | 73% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 81.7% | 68.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.3 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.