Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 18.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-04-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1418 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1416 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.03 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1415 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | — |
Multimodal Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | 1180 |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | — |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1397 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1404 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1422 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.