Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 50.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 39.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1347 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1322 |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1299 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.