Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 18.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-04-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1390 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.03 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1395 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1374 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1384 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1393 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.