Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 2 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.5 Flash leads 52.5 to 40.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2025-04-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.5 (#210), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1307 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.6 (#67), Hunyuan Large Vision: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.2 (#271), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1257 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.04 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 38.1 (#87), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1269 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.1 (#162), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1250 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.2 (#31), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | 1180 |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.5 (#83), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1289 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.9 (#50), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1250 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#16), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1279 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 54.0 (#153), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1253 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.