Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 31.1 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Fiction.LiveBench: 41.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 55.6% for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1440 |
Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1428 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1440 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.6% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 63% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1417 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1460 |
| LMArena French | — | 1413 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1435 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| IFEval | — | 81% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1389 |
Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | 55.6% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1403 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1334 |
| WildBench | — | 80.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1416 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.