Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 42.0 to 29.2.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1372 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1365 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1338 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena French | — | 1398 |
| LMArena German | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1305 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1355 |
Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1378 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1365 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.