Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 43.0 to 29.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 84.8% for Qwen3.5 Plus.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 ProQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.142.9
Released2025-02-052026-02-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked1415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.5 Plus
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.5 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06146.78
Chess Puzzles—22%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LMCA—36.4%
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LiveBench Math71%—
MATH Level 583.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond65.7%84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Confabulations18.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.5 Plus
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—

Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.5 Plus
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProQwen3.5 Plus
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper