Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Qwen3.5-Flash
Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 42.4 to 29.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 82.3% for Qwen3.5-Flash.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-02-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1244 |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 143.98 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1403 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1407 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1407 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1446 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1368 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1400 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1374 |
Long Context Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1392 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Qwen3.5-Flash?
Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Qwen3.5-Flash share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.