Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Ministral 3B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Ministral 3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 14.4% for Ministral 3B.
- Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Ministral 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 26.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-10-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 118.1 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 51.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 14.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 25.3% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.3% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Ministral 3B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Ministral 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Ministral 3B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Ministral 3B share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.