Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 43.3 to 29.2.
  • MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiniMax-M2.7 specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProMiniMax-M2.7
ProviderGoogleMiniMax
Noometry Index39.137.7
Released2025-02-052026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1430

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMiniMax-M2.7
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1398
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—37%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1454
ALE-Bench—599.25

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMiniMax-M2.7
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06145.85
NYT Connections (extended)—24.7%
CritPt—0.6%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1422
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMiniMax-M2.7
ProofBench—3%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1420
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMiniMax-M2.7
GPQA Diamond65.7%—
Confabulations18.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.9%
LMArena Expert—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English—1382
LMArena Chinese—1441
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1398
LMArena Japanese—1262
LMArena Korean—1313
LMArena Russian—1383
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMiniMax-M2.7
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1405

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMiniMax-M2.7
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1419

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text—1405
LMArena Creative Writing—1354
LMArena Multi-Turn—1412
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than MiniMax-M2.7?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper