Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.6 to 54.5.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1025 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1047 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1064 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1061 |
Long Context Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1058 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.