Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6.1 Sol in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 81.9 to 22.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 95.4% for GPT-6.1 Sol.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index39.165.6
Released2025-02-052026-09-29
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked1434

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
DeepSWE—75.2%
FrontierCode—50.2%
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1755
SciCode—55.8%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1487

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
APEX-Agents—60%
GDP.pdf—32%

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06166.09
ARC-AGI-2—94.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—95.5%
ARC-AGI-1—98.5%
CritPt—31.7%
Chess Puzzles—61%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
EBR-Bench—54.3%
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1466
Mystery Game Puzzles—80%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LiveBench65.1%—

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—93.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—100%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—99%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1464
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
GPQA Diamond65.7%95.4%
SimpleQA Verified—73.9%
Confabulations18.4%—
LMArena Expert—1502

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision—1288
Furniture Assembly—80%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Non-English—1438
LMArena Chinese—1477
LMArena Russian—1455

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1468

Long Context GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1465

Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text—1447
LMArena Creative Writing—1432
LMArena Multi-Turn—1449
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-6.1 Sol share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper