Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs GPT-4 Turbo
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and GPT-4 Turbo in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 8.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 46.7% for GPT-4 Turbo.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2023-11-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $30 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), GPT-4 Turbo: 33.4 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 18% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1268 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58.2% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 86.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 73.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4 Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | — | 36.7% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), GPT-4 Turbo: 14.9 (#311)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 127.25 |
| SimpleBench | — | 25.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 6% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1251 |
| DTBench | — | 61.6% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| LMCA | — | 9.8% |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.4 |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), GPT-4 Turbo: 8.6 (#316)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | 46.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 0.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1272 |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 46.6% |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | 28.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1223 |
| MMLU | — | 81.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4 Turbo: 30.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1090 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4 Turbo: 40.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1275 |
| LMArena German | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1194 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1187 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1260 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), GPT-4 Turbo: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1250 |
Long Context GPT-4 Turbo leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1254 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), GPT-4 Turbo: 47.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1267 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than GPT-4 Turbo?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or GPT-4 Turbo better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and GPT-4 Turbo share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 Turbo has 36.