Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 7B
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 7B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | 111.99 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1042 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1066 |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1001 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1035 |
| LMArena French | — | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 993 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1017 |
Long Context Gemma 7B leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1022 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 963 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 7B?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 7B better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 7B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.