Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 12B

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

38.6

Rank #171 Confirmed

Gemma 3 12B Google

31.8

Rank #255 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 3 12B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 37.1 to 21.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 65.7% for Gemini 2.0 Pro and 39.5% for Gemma 3 12B.
  • Gemma 3 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3 12B specifications
Gemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index38.631.8
Released2025-02-052025-03-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked1424

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182), Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
Aider Polyglot35.6%—
SciCode—17.4%
LiveBench Coding63.5%—
LMArena Coding—1281

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—30.4%

Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194), Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
Epoch Capabilities Index135.06123.49
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
EnigmaEval0.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning60.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1309
DTBench—48.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis68%—
LMCA—4.5%
LiveBench65.1%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101), Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.7%
LiveBench Math71%—
LMArena Math—1307
MATH Level 583.5%—

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156), Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
GPQA Diamond65.7%39.5%
Confabulations18.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.4%
LMArena Expert—1248

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 3 12B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
MindCube—46.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
LMArena Non-English—1318
LMArena German—1370
LMArena Russian—1335

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57), Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
LiveBench Instruction Following83.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1299

Long Context Gemma 3 12B leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287), Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
Fiction.LiveBench41.7%—
LMArena Longer Query—1317

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164), Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 ProGemma 3 12B
LMArena Text—1334
LMArena Creative Writing—1331
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1126
LMArena Multi-Turn—1334
LiveBench Language44.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 3 12B?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Gemma 3 12B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3 12B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper