Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 41 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 41 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 3 categories and o1 in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where o1 leads 46.1 to 28.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CadEval: 30% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 56% for o1.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | 69.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1367 |
| CadEval | 30% | 56% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | 41.7% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | 91.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1371 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | 65.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 141.91 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | 75.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | 80.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1388 |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | 9.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
Knowledge o1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | 8% |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1361 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1168 |
| GeoBench | 77% | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1394 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1344 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1345 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | 81.5% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1367 |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context o1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1378 |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1348 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | 70.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1369 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | 65.4% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and o1 share?
41 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.