Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 26 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite in 9 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 49.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 37.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 67.2% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-03-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 25.8% | 52.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1400 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1256 |
| SciCode | — | 41.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 797.73 |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 37.3% |
Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | 67.2% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1407 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 76.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 144.47 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8.2% |
| CritPt | — | 1.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 25% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 63.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 35% |
| ForecastBench | — | 54.4 |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 80% |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1428 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 27.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | 8.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1398 |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1240 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1411 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1461 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1424 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1392 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1420 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1421 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1377 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1394 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1416 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1417 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite share?
26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38.