Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 15.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 63.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 94.4% for Muse Spark 1.1.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 49.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1498 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 31.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1486 |
| DTBench | 63.2% | 94.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 154.21 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1483 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1293 |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1518 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1494 |
| LMArena German | 1353 | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1483 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | 1464 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1457 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1462 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1437 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | 1927 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1485 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Muse Spark 1.1 share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.