Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Llama 3.2 90B
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 36.1 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 34.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.2 (#308), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1351 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Llama 3.2 90B leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.0 (#85), Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#308), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | 125.5 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.1 (#127), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 2.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | 39.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1351 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#207), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | 41% |
| MMLU | 79.7% | 80.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1340 | — |
Multimodal Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 35.9 (#74), Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | 1000 |
| GeoBench | 77% | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.6 (#144), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1390 | — |
| LMArena German | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1293 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.6 (#91), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#198), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.8 (#184), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 3.2 90B share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.