Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 37.9 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 82.2% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025).
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 35.1 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1350 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 13.5% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 38.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 25.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 59.9% |
| CadEval | — | 30% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 11.4% |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1346 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 63.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 135.36 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 31.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 1.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 78.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 69.4% |
| LiveBench | — | 66.9% |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 57.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1352 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 82.2% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 45.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 75.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 64.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1339 |
| MMLU | 70% | 79.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 6.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 55.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1158 |
| GeoBench | — | 77% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1342 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1353 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1294 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1351 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1363 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1336 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 85.8% |
| IFEval | — | 84.1% |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1344 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 61.1% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1354 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1340 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1350 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1128 |
| WildBench | — | 80% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)?
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54.