Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.1 vs 35.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) Google

35.1

Rank #228 Confirmed

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #222 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads 74.4 to 62.9.
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
ProviderGoogleNVIDIA
Noometry Index35.135.9
Released2024-12-06—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked5412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Coding13501223
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)13.5%—
Aider Polyglot38.2%—
WeirdML25.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.9%—
LiveBench Coding63.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59.9%—
CadEval30%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
TheAgentCompany11.4%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13461203
ARC-AGI-21.3%—
SimpleBench31.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.8%—
EnigmaEval1.1%—
LiveBench Reasoning78.2%—
DTBench63.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis69.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.36—
LiveBench66.9%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Math13521230
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202557.8%—
Omni-MATH45.9%—
LiveBench Math75.8%—
MATH Level 582.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Expert13391167
GPQA Diamond64.1%—
Humanity's Last Exam6.6%—
MMLU-Pro73.7%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)55.6%—
MMLU79.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Vision1158—
GeoBench77%—

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13421181
LMArena Chinese13731180
LMArena Russian13511187
LMArena French1391—
LMArena German1353—
LMArena Japanese1294—
LMArena Korean1313—
LMArena Spanish1363—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13361201
LiveBench Instruction Following85.8%—
IFEval84.1%—

Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13441205
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
LMArena Text13541228
LMArena Creative Writing13401213
LMArena Multi-Turn13501227
Short-Story Creative Writing73.8%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1128—
WildBench80%—
LiveBench Language51.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.1 vs 35.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.6 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper