Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 33 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) Google

35.1

Rank #228 Confirmed

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 33 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 42.4 to 28.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SWE-bench Verified (bash only): 13.5% for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and 63.4% for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025).
  • Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) specifications
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index35.141.2
Released2024-12-062025-07-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.57
Output $ / M tokens—$2.30
Results tracked5442

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)13.5%63.4%
Aider Polyglot38.2%59.1%
WeirdML25.8%42.8%
LMArena Coding13501399
GSO—4.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct45.9%—
LiveBench Coding63.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete59.9%—
CadEval30%—
ALE-Bench—597.5

Agentic & Tool Use Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Terminal-Bench—35.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—59.1%
TheAgentCompany11.4%—
METR Time Horizons—59.2%

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
SimpleBench31.1%26.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.8%64.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts13461384
Epoch Capabilities Index135.36146.01
ARC-AGI-21.3%—
EnigmaEval1.1%—
LiveBench Reasoning78.2%—
DTBench63.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis69.4%—
ForecastBench—60.2
LiveBench66.9%—

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Omni-MATH45.9%65.4%
LMArena Math13521397
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%21.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202557.8%—
LiveBench Math75.8%—
MATH Level 582.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
MMLU-Pro73.7%81.9%
Confabulations12.4%20.4%
GPQA (HELM)55.6%65.3%
LMArena Expert13391365
GPQA Diamond64.1%—
Humanity's Last Exam6.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.9%
MMLU79.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Vision1158—
GeoBench77%—

Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Non-English13421372
LMArena Chinese13731415
LMArena French13911379
LMArena German13531387
LMArena Japanese12941349
LMArena Korean13131325
LMArena Russian13511385
LMArena Spanish13631386

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
IFEval84.1%85%
LMArena Instruction Following13361348
LiveBench Instruction Following85.8%—

Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Fiction.LiveBench61.1%66.7%
LMArena Longer Query13441353
CL-bench—17.6%

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025)Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Text13541380
LMArena Creative Writing13401350
Short-Story Creative Writing73.8%85.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing11281666
WildBench80%86.2%
LMArena Multi-Turn13501371
LiveBench Language51.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?

33 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper