Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Yi-1.5-34B

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.2

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 34.6 to 14.8.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
ProviderGoogle01.AI
Noometry Index37.330.2
Released2025-02-052024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding13221169
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts13241160
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math13091182
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Expert13051144
GPQA Diamond—32%
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103), Yi-1.5-34B: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English13231121
LMArena Chinese13391213
LMArena French13461155
LMArena German13061111
LMArena Japanese13021021
LMArena Korean13251005
LMArena Russian13281091
LMArena Spanish13131120

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following13051139
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query13211144

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text13301173
LMArena Creative Writing13191135
LMArena Multi-Turn13071153
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Yi-1.5-34B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper